Legal Opinion

Smith International, Inc. v. Kennametal, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided October 29, 1985No. C81-273PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DOWD, District Judge.

Before the Court is the defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment against the plaintiffs under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). Defendant argues that plaintiffs’ United States Letters Patent No. 4,201,421 is invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) on grounds that “[tjhere was a public use or sale in this country of the wear sleeve bit claimed in the ’421 patent prior to [the date the patent application was filed].” See defendant’s memorandum in support of their motion, p. 1. Plaintiffs oppose defendant’s motion. A recitation of the factual and procedural background of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik Ag v. Murata MacHinery Ltd., and Murata of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Union Carbide Corporation v. American Can CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  4. In Re Jack E. Caveney and Roy A. MoodyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  5. Shaw v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1833

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Indemnity Insurance Company of North America, as subrogee of GE Medical Systems Trade and Development (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. v. Huatai Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Ltd., as subrogee of GE Medical Systems Trade and Development (Shanghai) Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2026
  2. Sabol v. PayPal Holdings, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API