Legal Opinion
Hahn v. Whiting Petroleum Corp.
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided September 15, 2005No. 13-02-391-CVPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by Justice GARZA.
By nine issues, Keith Hahn challenges a default judgment entered against him on a suit filed by Whiting Petroleum Corporation, RK Petroleum Corporation, and Tre-mont Energy, LLC. Because we conclude that Hahn satisfied Craddock’s three-prong test for a new trial following entry of a default judgment, we sustain Hahn’s seventh issue, reverse the case, and remand it to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. See Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc., 134 Tex. 388, 133 S.W.2d 124, 126 (1939).
The plaintiffs’ suit against Hahn asserted…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
- Cliff v. HugginsTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Director, State Employees Workers' Compensation Division v. EvansTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Angelo v. Champion Restaurant Equipment Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
- Ferguson & Co. v. Roll, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Darby Kyle, Individually and D/B/A South Coast Roofing and Repair, and South Coast Roofing and Repair, LLC v. Alma Zepeda, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
- Hahn v. Whiting Petroleum Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005
- Mary Louise Segura v. Gilbert A. Segura, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011
- Masoud Kahrobaie, Ebrahim Kahrobaie, and Joseph Kahrobaie A/K/A Yusef Kahrobee v. Wilshire State Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
- Osvaldo Garcia, Individually and D/B/A Club Anarchy v. Thomas Tester, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.