Legal Opinion

People v. Sanders

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 26, 1963No. Crim 8554PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.

By an amended information the defendant Sanders and Jack O’Neal Haekett were charged with the crime of robbery. (Pen. Code, § 211.) It was alleged that money was taken from Henry F. Zander, who was “a person who was then and there performing his duties as operator of a motor vehicle used for the transportation of persons for hire.” It was further alleged that at the time of the com mission of the offense, the defendants “were armed with a deadly weapon, to wit, switch-blade knife.” Each defendant waived his right to trial by jury. The defendant Sanders was convicted of robbery of the first…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. FrankfortCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. People v. HightowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. People v. AlonzoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Buckley v. CoreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. People v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. People v. DebnamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API