Legal Opinion

Rochester General Hospital v. Ingstrum

Monroe County Court

Decided February 18, 1939PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Duser, J.

The Rochester General Hospital appeals from a judgment denying it a recovery against the respondent Thomas C. Ingstrum. The action was brought to recover for hospital services furnished to respondent’s wife. These services were determined to be, and are conceded to be, “ necessaries.” Recovery was denied, however, because (1) the wife was living apart from her husband “ without legal cause for separation, though with defendant’s consent;” and by reason thereof the implied agency which the wife had by reason of the marital relation was suspended; and (2) that in rendering its services the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mirizio v. MirizioNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Constable v. RosenerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  3. Hatch v. . LeonardNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. Thrall Hospital v. CarenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  5. Button v. WeaverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gimbel Bros. v. SteinmanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1952
  2. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. SeizerCivil Court of the City of New York · 1965
  3. Rosenblatt v. WolfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  4. General Electric Credit Corp. v. Fox, New York County Courts1965
  5. Kepecs v. LobelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API