Legal Opinion

In Re Detention of Barnes

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 19, 2004No. 03-1216PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CADY, Justice.

Appellant Allen Albert Barnes appeals from a district court judgment finding him to be a sexually violent predator subject to civil commitment under Iowa Code chapter 229A (2003). His primary claim on appeal is that civil commitment violates his due process rights under both the federal and state constitutions because he has not been diagnosed with a mental abnormality that is in general directly related to sexual offending. For the reasons that follow, we reject the claim and affirm the district court judgment.

I. Background Facts and Proceedings

Barnes has a long history of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  5. State v. TagueSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Randy Scott MeyersSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  2. In RE the Detention of Jonathan Edwin Stenzel Jonathan Edwin StenzelSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  3. In Re the Detention of BetsworthSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  4. In Re the Care & Treatment of MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  5. In Re the Detention of AltmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API