Legal Opinion

New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Beardsley

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided May 27, 1924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinelite, J.

This is a motion made by the plaintiff to set aside a verdict obtained in favor of the defendant upon the ground that the defendant herein testified contrary to the evidence he gave in an action in the Supreme Court, county of New York, and particularly as to the amount of moneys which came into his hands arising out of the sale of certain personal property hereinafter more particularly described. This action was brought to recover from the defendant the sum of $1,200 alleged to have been collected by the defendant while acting as an agent of the plaintiff for the sale of certain film held by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nugent v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  2. Thompson v. WeldeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  3. Markert v. Long Island RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  4. Rosenthal v. Bell Realty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Henson v. Lehigh Valley RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Estes v. Anderson Oil Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Preleson v. AliNew York Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Dean v. DeanNew York Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API