Legal Opinion

Preleson v. Ali

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarris, J.

Motion No. I is a motion for a new trial on the ground that the verdict of the jury was against the weight of evidence.

Motion No. 2 is a motion for a new trial made on the ground of newly-discovered evidence.

Both of these motions were made and heard at a Special Term by a justice who did not preside at the trial and after the term at which the case was tried had been terminated.

Motion No. 2 must be denied because there is not sufficient shown to meet the requirements on which a motion may be granted on the ground of newly-discovered evidence. (New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Beardsley, 123…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. BeardsleyCity of New York Municipal Court · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sachs v. BlumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  2. Hart v. Ithaca ConservatoryNew York Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Travitzky v. SchamrothNew York Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API