Legal Opinion
Com-Tel, Inc. v. Dukane Corporation and Central Sound Supply Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 28, 1982No. 79-3545PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAILEY BROWN, Circuit Judge.
This antitrust action was brought by Com-Tel, Inc. (Com-Tel) against co-defendants DuKane Corporation (DuKane) and Central Sound Supply Co., Inc. (Central Sound), alleging that they conspired to boycott the sale to Com-Tel of DuKane sound equipment in violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 (1976). The Du-Kane equipment was specified for the Western High School and Rockford Lane Middle School Project (Western-Rockford project), a project of the Jefferson County (Kentucky) Board of Education (Board).
This case was tried to a jury on Com-Tel’s single theory…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Topco Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Nynex Corp. v. Discon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Discon, Incorporated v. Nynex Corporation, Nynex Material Enterprises, New York Telephone Company, Robert J. Eckenrode, and Bernard O'ReillyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Westman Commission Company, Cross-Appellant v. Hobart International, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Davis-Watkins Company, Plaintiff-Counter and Amana Refrigeration, Inc., Counter v. Service Merchandise, Defendant-CounterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Graphic Products Distributors, Inc. v. Itek Corporation, Individually and D/B/A Itek Graphic Products, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.