Legal Opinion

B'nai B'rith Club, Inc. v. City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 21, 1936PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent is a membership corpora^ tian, not a fraternal organization. It uses the real property in question for rental purposes and profit. It does not, therefore, come under the first part of section 4, subdivision 6 (formerly 7) of the Tax Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 60). The property is not used exclusively for charitable or benevolent purposes, and it is not used exclusively for meetings, and the net income is not used exclusively to build and maintain a home for the members of the corporation; therefore, the real property is not exempt under the second part of section 4, subdivision 6. (Cf.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Masonic Hall Ass'n v. WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. People ex rel. Masonic Hall Ass'n v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  3. Matter of Syracuse Masonic TempleNew York Court of Appeals · 1936

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Yeshivath Shearith Hapletah v. Assessor of FallsburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. People Ex Rel. Trustees of the Masonic Hall & Asylum Fund v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. People ex rel. Trustees of the Masonic Hall & Asylum Fund v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  4. People ex rel. Manhattan & Bronx Councils, Inc. v. MillerNew York Supreme Court · 1937
  5. People ex rel. Trustees of Masonic Hall & Asylum Fund v. MillerNew York Supreme Court · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API