Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Mason

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1902No. Docket No. 172PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Muskegon; Russell, J. Bill by Sarah H. Gardner against Michael Mason and Gustav H. Neumeister to set. áside an execution sale. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This bill is filed to set aside a certain levy made by the sheriff, and a sale thereunder of certain premises claimed to be owned by the complainant. On the hearing below, complainant’s bill was dismissed. Complainant has appealed.

*437It appears that on the 26th day of March, 1900, defendant Mason, in a suit brought in justice’s court, obtained a judgment of $110 damages and $3.80 costs of suit against James E. Gardner, complainant’s husband; that, on the 10th day of April, Mason took a transcript, filed the same with the clerk of Muskegon county, and had the same docketed as a judgment in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wooden v. WoodenMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. PhillpottsMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Schmidt v. SteinbachMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Reno v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. In re Plymouth Glass Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API