Legal Opinion
Timerson v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided November 21, 1932No. 22022; No. 22023; No. 22024; No. 22025PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAckerson, J.
The demands set forth in these claims are for damages alleged to have been suffered by reason of a defect in a *614State highway between Baldwinsville and Plainville in the county of Onondaga and State of New York. As the claims are all based on personal injuries and property damage suffered in the same accident they were tried together.
They were filed pursuant to a special act of the Legislature, known as chapter 748 of the Laws of 1931, which conferred jurisdiction on the Court of Claims to hear, audit and determine the four claims and which further provided that “ if the court finds that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Slater v. BarnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Farrell v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Ristau v. . Frank Coe CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Ristau v. E. Frank Coe Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- De Pasquale v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1928
3Cited by6 opinions
- LeBoeuf v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1938
- Sutherland v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1947
- Logan v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1937
- Coakley v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1961
- Campbell v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.