Legal Opinion

Canup v. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 5, 1962No. Civ. A. No. 62-611PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUMBAULD, District Judge.

On August 6, 1962, plaintiff’s complaint under the Jones Act and alleging unseaworthiness was filed. Maintenance and cure is also sought. Jury trial was demanded. The usual printed notice required defendant to answer “within 20 days after service - * *. If you fail to do so, judgment by default will be taken against you for the relief demanded in the complaint.” Service by the Marshal was made on August 8, 1962.

No answer having been filed, plaintiff on August 29, 1962, issued praecipe to enter default, which was done. At the same time a motion for judgment under. Rule…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Taylor v. Monongahela Railway Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1957

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Clark County State Bank v. BennettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Greene v. PyattDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1978
  3. Johnson v. Town of BabylonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1978
  4. Salisbury v. Town of WatertownDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1979
  5. Brennan v. KaplanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API