Legal Opinion

In re Glicksberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 11, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSherman, J.

The petitioner on December 1, 1930, paid to the Bank of United States the sum of $500 with directions to transmit *540it to an individual at Warsaw, Poland, which the bank promised and agreed to do and gave him a receipt therefor. Stamped “ paid ” by the bank, it states the payment by petitioner of the sum of $500, plus a charge of $2.50, malting a total of $502.50 “ for the transmission of U. S. Dollars $500 ” to one Majufes, at Warsaw, subject to printed conditions on its reverse side at the foot of which petitioner placed his signature. This paper (in form a mere receipt) is therein referred…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Legniti v. Mechanics & Metals National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Cutler v. American Exchange National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Beecher v. Cosmopolitan Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  4. Musco v. United Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  5. People ex rel. Zotti v. FlynnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Southern Pacific Railroad Co. of Mexico v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API