Legal Opinion

Eastern Tunneling Corp. v. Southgate Sanitation District

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided March 27, 1980No. Civ. A. 77-K-997PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KANE, District Judge.

This is a diversity action brought by plaintiff contractor, Eastern Tunneling Corporation (“ETC”), against Southgate Sanitation District, a public corporation organized under the laws of the State of Colorado, for additional amounts of work performed under a contract for the construction of the Orchard Tunnel, a sanitary sewage tunnel. The case is currently before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

The district awarded the construction contract in question to plaintiff after plaintiff submitted the lowest bid for the work at…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Christie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. United States v. Atlantic Dredging Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Mike Bruce v. Martin-Marietta Corporation and Ozark Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cook v. Oklahoma Board of Public AffairsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  2. Pinkerton and Laws Co., Inc. v. Roadway Exp., Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1986
  3. M.C. Anderson v. GoldenDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1982
  4. Lowell Staats Mining Co. v. Pioneer Uravan, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1984
  5. McDevitt & Street Co. v. Marriott Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API