Legal Opinion

Smith v. Fourth Street Bank

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 16, 1917PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Daviess Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Miller

Reversing.

The appellants, Caleb Smith and Mary E. Smith, are husband and wife.

About 1895, Mary E. Smith and her brothers and sisters inherited the Hunter tract of land in Daviess county, from their father, Mrs. Smith inheriting a one-fifth interest therein. Shortly thereafter, Caleb Smith bought the interests of the other four heirs, and he with his wife and family resided on the Hunter tract until about 1909, when Smith and his wife sold it for $2,250.00. They then removed to Owensboro and bought what is known in the record as the Triplett street property,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bank of Versailles v. GuthreySupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  2. Balz v. NelsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Snapp v. SnappCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
  4. Kuevan v. SpeckerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1875
  5. Dugan v. MasseyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1869

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Share v. TrickleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Stewart v. BlackOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Paintsville National Bank v. ConleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  4. Robinson, Norton & Co. v. BurnettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  5. Helton v. VanderpoolCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API