Legal Opinion
Kolkman v. Eshelman
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 29, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Charles B. Wheeler,
Official Referee. None of the essential facts in the case are in dispute. The only questions involved are questions of law growing out of the peculiar circumstances of the case.
The defendant Andrew Eshelman is the owner of a tract of land consisting of some ten acres located in the town of Clarence, Erie county. A Mr. Eichner called on him and stated he wished to purchase some 100 feet of land fronting on the highway and off the end of the property. The two walked to the parcel desired and paced off as near as they could 100 feet. Eichner stated he wished the land for the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McKinley v. . HessenNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Canda v. . TottenNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Rice v. . CulverNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Beck v. Catholic University of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
3Cited by4 opinions
- Blackman-Shapiro Co. v. SalzbergCity of New York Municipal Court · 1957
- Jannotta v. Noslac Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- East Coast Mines & Materials Corp. v. Golf Course Properties Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- In re Country Village Heights CondominiumNew York Supreme Court · 1975