Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. Cook

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided January 17, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Drury, Commissioner

Affirming.

Appellants sought by virtue of section 2133, Ky. Stats., to have adjudged forfeited the devise made by C. Lee Cook to his wife, Gulielma Stiles Cook, because she had, so they said, left him and clandestinely lived in adultery for more than a year immediately preceding his death, of which acts he had no knowledge, and that he never thereafter became reconciled to her or lived with her as her husband with knowledge thereof. They were unsuccessful, and seek from this court the relief denied them by the trial court.

There is but one question…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Nunnemacher v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Casey v. St. Louis Transit Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Childers' v. CartwrightCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  5. L. D. Pearson & Son v. BonnieCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Superior Oil Corporation v. AlcornCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  2. Ping v. DentonKentucky Supreme Court · 1978
  3. El Paso Electric Co. v. PortilloCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Traughber v. KingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  5. Griffin v. RiceKentucky Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API