Legal Opinion

John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Davis

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 21, 1942No. 2411PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICE, Chief Justice.

Elizabeth M. Davis, a widow, and another, brought this suit against John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company, alleging as a basis of recovery, that two promissory notes payable to defendant were tainted with usury. One note was for the principal sum of $2,500, was dated January 18, 1924, and bore annual interest at the rate of 6½ per cent per annum; the other was for the principal sum of $2,000, was dated January 28, 1927, and bore interest at 6 per cent per annum. Each note was secured by a deed of trust of even date, and each deed of trust contained the following…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lively v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Maloney v. EaheartTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Johnston v. Lasker Real Estate Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893
  4. Texas Loan Agency v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898
  5. Clark v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bridgeman v. Gateway Ford Truck SalesDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1969
  2. Texas Land & Mortg. Co. v. MullicanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API