Legal Opinion

Texas Land & Mortg. Co. v. Mullican

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 14, 1942No. 10344PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCORD, Circuit Judge.

On the former appeal we held that the question of usury and the determination of the balance due by the debtor on the loan should have been determined by the court after a hearing. Mullican v. Texas Land & Mortgage Co., 5 Cir., 117 F.2d 576; Id., *2425 Cir., 118 F.2d 560. After the mandate went down, the referee heard the evidence and found the claim of the creditor to be tainted with usury; that the amounts paid to the creditor as interest should be credited as payments on the principal; and that the interest payments aggregated more than the principal obligation and were…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Shropshire v. Commerce Farm Credit Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Shropshire v. Commerce Farm Credit Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1931
  3. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. TodTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Galveston & Houston Investment Co. v. GrymesTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Commerce Trust Co. v. RampTexas Commission of Appeals · 1940

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bridgeman v. Gateway Ford Truck SalesDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1969
  2. Bayou Place Limited Partnership v. Alleppo's Grill, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API