Legal Opinion

Mayaguez Drug Co. v. Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 29, 1932PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant issued policies of insurance against damage by fire to plaintiff’s property. A fire occurred and damage resulted. The complaint demands the sum of $70,200 with interest thereon from the date of the fire. The sealed verdict as reported in open court was for the amount of $55,000. Plaintiff moved to amend the clerk’s minutes by adding interest. This motion was denied and the order of denial was affirmed by a divided court. From the final judgment plaintiff appeals to this court. Since the judgment is final and was rendered by a divided Appellate Division, it is appealable as of right.

D…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Men's World Outlet, Inc. v. Estate of SteinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Buffalo Oil Terminal, Inc. v. Kimmins & Sons, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Greenfield v. TrippAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  4. Borlan Corp. v. Oriental Quilting & Novelty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Greater New York Coal & Oil Corp. v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API