Legal Opinion

Greenfield v. Tripp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 15, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the appeal is (1) from a judgment, entered on a jury’s verdict, in favor of respondent, and (2) from an order resettling said judgment so as to add interest thereto. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs. Whether the relationship of respondent to appellant was that of a theatrical employment agency, in which event respondent required a license, or that of a manager, in which event he did not, was a question of fact to be resolved by the jury. (Mandel v. Liebman, 303 N. Y. 88; Hyde v. Vinolas, 234 App. Div. 364.)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mandel v. LiebmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Flamm v. NobleNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  3. Mayaguez Drug Co. v. Globe & Rutgers Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. Hyde v. VinolasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Friedkin v. Harry Walker, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1977
  2. Shelton v. Elite Model Management, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Vale v. HeitnerCivil Court of the City of New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API