Legal Opinion

State v. Breidenbach

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 1964No. 7644 and 7645PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Charles P. Breidenbach, defendant, has appealed from his conviction of two charges of violating Section 303.23 of the Revised Code, the state alleging that Breidenbach used land in violation of the Franklin County Zoning Resolution, adopted in 1948. Breidenbach pleaded not guilty and, among several errors assigned, claims that the state’s evidence was insufficient for failure to offer any proof concerning a prior nonconforming use or that Breidenbach does not come within any exception in the ordinance.

In substance, the state’s claim was that Breidenbach on or about October 1, 1963, and also…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Village of Strongsville v. McPheeOhio Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. PaceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  2. State v. Larson Transfer & Storage, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. McKemy v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  4. Mergenthaler v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
  5. St. Louis County v. PfitznerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API