Legal Opinion

St. Louis County v. Pfitzner

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 21, 1983No. 46379PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARD, Judge.

Defendants appeal from an adverse judgment enjoining them from placing or towing damaged or wrecked vehicles onto a vacant lot which they owned adjoining their auto body repair shop.

The case was tried on stipulated facts. The defendants, Eberhard and Anita Pfitz-ner, own two parcels of land. One parcel is known as 9730 Halls Ferry, which the Pfitz-ners acquired in August of 1967. They run an auto body repair shop on this parcel which is a non-conforming use of the property under § 1003.170, St. Louis County Revised Ordinance (SLCRO), 1974, as amended. The second parcel of land…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Matter of Monument Garage Corp. v. LevyNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Service Realty Corporation v. Planning & Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  3. Suburbia Gardens Nursery, Inc. v. County of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  4. Incorporated Village of Great Neck v. GreenNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  5. State v. BreidenbachOhio Court of Appeals · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Louisiana v. BranhamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. University Place-Lincoln Associates L.P. v. NelsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. St. Louis County v. TaggertMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. State ex rel. County of St. Charles v. SamuelsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API