Legal Opinion
Kaiser Steel Corp. v. Frates (In re Kaiser Steel Corp.)
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 10, 1990No. 90-1013PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TACHA, Circuit Judge.
This is an interlocutory appeal from an order of the district court 109 B.R. 968 (D.Colo.1989) affirming an interlocutory order of the bankruptcy court 95 B.R. 782 (D.Colo.1989) striking the appellants’ jury demands. Alternatively, defendants-appellants/petitioners petition for a writ of mandamus. They contend that the courts below erred in holding that: (1) by filing an indemnity counterclaim in an adversary bankruptcy proceeding, a defendant consents to bankruptcy court jurisdiction and consequently loses his seventh amendment right to jury trial; and (2) as a result of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Workman v. JordanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- In Re William E. BRAYSHAW, Debtor. H. Christopher CLARK, Trustee-Appellant, v. William E. BRAYSHAW, Debtor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- First Fidelity Bank, N.A. v. Hooker Investments, Inc. (In re Hooker Investments, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Nationwide Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc. v. Cincinnati Insurance Co. (In Re Nationwide Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
- In Re Raymond Clay and Scott Clay, D/B/A the EmporiumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.