Legal Opinion

Delta Air Lines, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 17, 1974No. 73-1799PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RONEY, Circuit Judge:

An aircraft purchased by Delta Air Lines, Inc. from McDonnell Douglas Corporation, the manufacturer, suffered damages when its nose gear collapsed during a landing in Jacksonville, Florida, because a component part was incorrectly installed. There were no personal injuries. Delta seeks to recover from McDonnell the expenses incurred in repair on four theories of liability: (1) negligence; (2) breach of implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose; (3) breach of express warranty; and, (4) strict liability in tort. The District Court dismissed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Ford Motor Company v. Marvin R. MathisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Mid Continent Aircraft Corp. v. Curry County Spraying Service, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
  2. S. A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio Grandense (Varig Airlines) v. Walter Kidde & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. Rafael Fernandez-Roque v. William French Smith, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  4. Silverberg v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  5. Twiss v. KuryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API