Legal Opinion
Salozzo v. Wagner Spray Tech Corp.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 16, 1991No. 90-118PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
578 So.2d 393 (1991)
Peter J. SALOZZO, Appellant,
v.
WAGNER SPRAY TECH CORPORATION, Appellee.
No. 90-118.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 16, 1991.
James L. Ferraro and Marjorie N. Salem, Miami, for appellant.
Nicklaus Valle Craig & Wicks and Bill Edwards and Richard M. Davis, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and COPE, JJ.
2Per curiam
Upon the conclusion that the record presents jury questions as to whether the defendant-appellee manufacturer adequately warned potential users against the dangers of a foreseeable method of operating its paint spray gun, the judgment…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Tampa Drug Company v. WaitSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
- Uptain v. Huntington Lab, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Thelma Billiar v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, Defendant/third Party Plaintiff v. Mennen-Greatbatch Electronics, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- American Cyanamid Co. v. RoySupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Streich v. Hilton-Davis, Div. of Sterling DrugMontana Supreme Court · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Scheman-Gonzalez v. Saber Mfg. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Brown v. Glade & Grove Supply, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Lopez v. Southern Coatings, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991