Legal Opinion
Randy Allen Myers v. United States Parole Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 26, 1987No. 85-6264PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRIS, Circuit Judge:
The panel unanimously agrees that this case may be submitted without oral argument.
Pro se petitioner Randy Alien Myers appeals from the district court’s decision to dismiss his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The district court ruled that Myers was not “in custody” as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c), and thus that the court lacked jurisdiction to consider the petition. Without agreeing or disagreeing with the district court’s ruling that Myers was not “in custody” for the purposes of habeas jurisdiction, we affirm the district court's decision on the alternative…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Fiswick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Conklin Wallace v. Robert ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Beaudry Motor Co. v. Abko Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Ruth E. Oscar Charles Spinosa v. University Students Co-Operative Association George ProperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Imagineering, Inc. v. Kiewit Pacific Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Jeffrey Connell v. Lima CorporateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- City of Clinton v. LoeffelholzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
- Cook v. MalengCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.