Legal Opinion
Imagineering, Inc. v. Kiewit Pacific Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 7, 1992No. 91-35970PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEAVY, Circuit Judge:
This case involves an appeal from the district court’s dismissal of the plaintiffs’ complaint for failure to state a claim. 759 F.Supp. 1498. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). A plaintiff class of minority and woman-owned business enterprises (“MWBEs”) appeal the dismissal of its action against Kiewit Pacific Company, Kiewit Construction Company, and Peter Kiewit Sons’, Inc. (“Kiewit”), who are prime contractors, challenging an alleged scheme to evade federal and state regulations requiring prime contractors to employ MWBEs on public works construction projects by using phony MWBEs…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Forsyth v. Humana, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Newcal Industries, Inc. v. IKON Office SolutionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Raymond J. TIMM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the MEAD CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Rajiv Khurana v. Innovative Health Care Systems, Inc. Karry Teel Carl Holden William Malone I.H.S. River Region Hospital of Vacherie, La., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Mattel, Inc. v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.