Pray v. Donald
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
"Weaver, J.
The promissory note on which a recovery is sought had its origin as follows: W. H. Donald and "W. Preston Donald (spoken of in the record as “Preston”) are father and son, and Osee "W. Donald is the son’s wife. Prior to the business complications directly involved in this controversy, the elder Donald was, to a considerable extent, engaged in the purchase and sale of farm lands, and the son was in -business on his own account, as a breeder and dealer in live stock. On March 1, 1917, "W. H. Donald held the title to 359 acres of land, subject to mortgage liens aggregating $23,000.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rogers Dev. Co. v. Southern California Real Estate Inv. Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Foster v. PaineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
- Loomis v. Davenport & St. P. R. Co.United States Circuit Court · 1882
- Lyon v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Boyd v. GreerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hannan v. MurphySupreme Court of Iowa · 1924