Loucks v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Fillmore county, Farmer, J., presiding, refusing a new trial after a verdict of $3,000 for plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.
The action is for the recovery of damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff, by reason of a freight train of the defendant coming in collision with the plaintiff’s wagon at the crossing of Section street over the railroad, in the village of Spring Valley. We are to consider whether the ease shows conclusively, and as matter of legal imputation, negligence in the conduct of the plaintiff, so that he should not recover for the alleged negligence of the defendant. The following diagram shows the situation of the premises :
*528
The depot buildings are east of Section street. The grade…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Continental Improvement Co. v. SteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Ernst v. . Hudson River Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1866
- Shaber v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Kennayde v. Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
- Langhoff v. Milwaukee & Prairie du Chien Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1865
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad v. FoxworthSupreme Court of Florida · 1899
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Columbus & Indianapolis Railway Co. v. HarringtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Kinyon v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LynnIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- Zenner v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.