Legal Opinion

Shaw v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 22, 1924No. 6 Div. 243. [fn*]PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

On the trial of this defendant many written charges were requested, some of which were given and some refused. As to those refused, only two are insisted upon as error. We have examined the other refused charges and find that the court was justified in refusing each of them; the reasons being so apparent as not to require a detailed discussion.

As to the refused charges insisted on as error, the first is:

“If the guilt of the defendant depends upon the testimony of the witness Willoughby, and the jury believe from the evidence that the evidence of said witness was willfully and maliciously…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lawman v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  3. City of Montgomery v. SuppleAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bynum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1976
  2. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  3. Bell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. Ex Parte ShawSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API