Legal Opinion

Lenal Properties, Inc. v. City of Jersey City

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 26, 2000PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal is before us following a remand to the Tax Court for further findings and conclusions concerning the court’s decision in favor of the taxpayer in this case. The facts underlying the appeal are detailed in our earlier decision, Lenal Properties, Inc. v. City of Jersey City, A-2205-97 (Dec. 3, 1998) and need not be repeated here. We remanded the matter to the Tax Court for an explanation as to why it had not mentioned the presumption of correctness that attaches to the quantum of the assessment made by the tax assessor of the property at issue in this ease. See Pantasote Co. v. City…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  2. Pantasote Co. v. City of PassaicSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. Township of EdisonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  4. Glen Wall Associates v. Township of WallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  5. Samuel Hird & Sons, Inc. v. City of GarfieldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. West Colonial Enterprises, LLC v. City of East OrangeNew Jersey Tax Court · 2003
  2. Greenblatt v. Englewood CityNew Jersey Tax Court · 2010
  3. Clemente v. Township of South HackensackNew Jersey Tax Court · 2013
  4. Elrabie v. Borough of Franklin LakesNew Jersey Tax Court · 2008
  5. Orient Way Corp. v. Township of LyndhurstNew Jersey Tax Court · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API