Legal Opinion

Clemente v. Township of South Hackensack

New Jersey Tax Court

Decided July 3, 2013PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDRESINI, J.T.C.

This constitutes the court’s opinion after trial in the above-referenced matter challenging the assessment on plaintiff’s property for the 2009, 2010, and 2011 tax year’s. For the reasons set forth in this opinion, the assessment is affirmed.

I. Procedural History and Findings of Fact

Donato Clemente (“plaintiff’) is the owner of a one story masonry building located in South Hackensack (“defendant”). The property is designated by South Hackensack as Block 50, Lot 17.02, more commonly known as 120 Leuning Street (“subject property”). For the tax years in question, the subject…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Pantasote Co. v. City of PassaicSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. Township of EdisonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  4. Dworman v. Borough of Tinton FallsNew Jersey Tax Court · 1980
  5. Rodwood Gardens, Inc. v. SummitNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clemente v. Township of South HackensackNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015
  2. CIBA SPECIALTY CHEMICALS, CORP. VS. TOWNSHIP OF DOVER (TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021
  3. Fields v. Trustees of Princeton UniversityNew Jersey Tax Court · 2015
  4. ML PLAINSBORO LTD PARTNERSHIP/GOMEZ VS. TOWNSHIP OF PLAINSBORO (TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY) (CONSOLIDATED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021
  5. UNITED DEVELOPMENT OF AMERICA, LLC VS. CITY OF PATERSON (TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY) (CONSOLIDATED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API