Legal Opinion
Franco v. Yale University
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 10, 2001No. 3:00CV1927(GLG)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
GOETTEL, District Judge.
This case involves a doctor who is having difficulty remedying a disease which he finds difficult to diagnose. The defendants move to dismiss the Amended Complaint.
The Amended Complaint, in stark disregard of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2) (stating that the Complaint should contain “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief’), contains some ninety-two paragraphs running twenty-three pages. We will attempt to summarize this opus.
After the jurisdictional and venue allegations (which are not…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Petyan v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- DeLaurentis v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Parsons v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Bolt Electric, Inc. v. The City of New York, Spring City Electrical Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Mellaly v. Eastman Kodak Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Franco v. Yale UniversityDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2002
- Copeland v. Home & Community Health Services, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
- Brescia v. LTF Club Management Company LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Marlak v. CorrectionDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023