Legal Opinion

Hadis Izadi, et al. v. United States Department of State, et al.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 17, 2026No. 2:25-cv-02354Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HADIS IZADI, et al., No. 2:25-cv-02354-DJC-SCR 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER 14 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF 15 STATE, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiffs claim Defendants have unreasonably delayed adjudicating their 19 application for asylum, which has been pending for over four years. Plaintiffs seek to 20 compel Defendants to do so via both the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) and 21 the Mandamus Act. Defendants now move to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint. 22 For the reasons stated below, the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Douglas Leite v. Crane CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API