Legal Opinion
Nunez v. Pachman
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 26, 2009No. 08-3314PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
RENDELL, Circuit Judge.
This appeal from the District Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants, and against plaintiff Francisco Nunez, requires us to decide whether disclosure of an expunged criminal record violates the right of privacy afforded by the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Relying on a footnote in our opinion in Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge No. 5 v. City of Philadelphia, 812 F.2d 105, 117 n. 8 (3d Cir.1987), the District Court concluded that no cognizable privacy interest lies in an expunged criminal record, which may linger in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Regents of the University of Michigan v. EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Angelynn York v. Ron Story and Louis MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Karen Malleus v. John GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Brokers' Choice of America, Inc. v. NBC Universal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Doe v. Luzerne CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Yusef Steele v. Warden CicchiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Joel Doe v. Boyertown Area School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.