Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Allen
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 4, 2004PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*846Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 4, 2003, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruling that claimant was discharged from his employment as a materials handler supervisor due to disqualifying misconduct. The record establishes that claimant returned late from lunch and had not punched in or out, as required. When his supervisor refused to sign claimant’s time…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Claim of RamosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of HawanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re the Claim of LivadasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of QuinonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Claim of EisenstadtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of TerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of MossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of WynneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005