Legal Opinion

Orenberg v. Thecker

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 26, 1944No. 8594PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Associate Justice.

It is contended on behalf of appellants in this case that the trial judge abused his discretion in. denying a motion for new trial. Two allegations, specifying" misconduct upon the part of jurors, constitute the basis for this contention The first is that two jurors, during the trial, without authorization, visited the scene of the accident involved in the case; that one of them made observations, inspections and experiments; and that both reported their observations to the other jurors. This specification was supported by the affidavits of three other jurors.

In…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Norris v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Board of Comm'rs of Jackson Cty. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Ryan v. United States. Duncan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  2. Young v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
  3. Dale Francis Derosier v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  4. Washington Gas Light Co. v. ConnollyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  5. Kilgore v. Greyhound Corp., Southern Greyhound LinesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1962

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API