Legal Opinion
United States v. Estate of Stonehill
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 28, 2011No. 10-35789PublishedCited by 91 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Harry Stonehill and Robert Brooks (“Taxpayers”) appeal the district court’s denial of their Rule 60(b) motion to vacate a 1967 tax judgment against them. Based on evidence discovered through the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), Taxpayers argue that the government committed fraud on the court during their 1967 suppression hearing, United States v. Stonehill, 274 F.Supp. 420 (S.D.Cal.1967) (“Stonehill /”), and their subsequent appeal to this court, Stonehill v. United States, 405 F.2d 738 (9th Cir.1968) (“Stone-hill II ”). We conclude that, although the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- W. Michael Kimes J. Colette Boykin v. Peter G. Stone, Judge, Superior Court Robert L. Mezzetti, II Henry Mariani Robert MacHadoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Standard Oil Co. of Cal. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- United States v. Sierra Pacific Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Gerald Pizzuto, Jr. v. Al RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- William Payton v. Ronald DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Trendsettah USA, Inc. v. Swisher International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.