Legal Opinion

Union Oil Company of California v. Eagerton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 10, 1982No. 81-169, 81-207, 81-503, 81-643, 81-966, 82-32, 82-165, 81-538, 81-972, 82-33 and 81-742PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALMON, Justice.

This appeal comes after remand of these consolidated cases in Eagerton v. Exchange Oil and Gas Corporation, 404 So.2d 1 (Ala.1981) (Eagerton v. Exchange). The trial court entered a judgment in favor of Ea-gerton, as Commissioner of Revenue based upon a stipulation of the parties. We affirm.

Many of the issues that the oil company appellants raise herein are identical to, or are variations on, the issues decided in Eagerton v. Exchange, supra. The legislature amended the oil and gas severance tax subsequent to that decision, however, so this appeal presents a further question of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Heisler v. Thomas Colliery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. State Docks Commission v. State Ex Rel. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Harris v. State Ex Rel. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HilsabeckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Ex Parte HilsabeckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. Exxon Corp. v. EagertonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. EagertonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API