Legal Opinion
Rubin v. Dairymen's League Cooperative Ass'n
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 6, 1940PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchenck, J.
The plaintiff, appellant-respondent (hereinafter referred to as plaintiff), appeals from that portion of the judgment herein which denied him an accounting for the period following April 9, 1935. The defendant, respondent-appellant (hereinafter referred to as defendant), files a cross-appeal from so much of the judgment which granted the plaintiff an accounting up to April 9, 1935.
The action was brought to compel an accounting pursuant to an alleged oral contract between the parties by which the plaintiff claims to have performed services and made sales on behalf of the defendant and, in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ehrenworth v. . Stuhmer Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Green v. . DisbrowNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Burke v. BonatNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Lynch v. MurphyNew York Supreme Court · 1913
- Lynch v. . MurphyNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
3Cited by8 opinions
- Aramony v. United Way Replacement Benefit PlanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Liberty Management & Construction Ltd. v. Fifth Avenue & Sixty-Sixth Street Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- New York Telephone Co. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1985
- William Aramony, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. United Way Replacement Benefit Plan, United Way Supplemental Benefits Agreement, Defendants-Counter-Claimants, United Way of America, Individually and as Administrator and Named Fiduciary Under the United Way of America Replacement Benefit Plan, and as Administrator of the United Way Supplemental Benefits Agreement, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- In re the Estate of PedoneNew York Surrogate's Court · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.