Burke v. Bonat
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Cardozo, Ch. J.
The action is for personal injuries.
Plaintiff in 1928 was the proprietor of a “ beauty parlor ” in the city of Troy. Defendants were manufacturers of the appliances that are used in a business of that kind. In particular they manufactured machines with fittings and appurtenances designed to give to hair a permanent wave or curl according to the Bonat method. They employed a traveling salesman, Cooper, who had samples of their products.
Cooper called at the plaintiff’s shop on May 9, 1928, and sold her certain,tubes and winders which if used in connection with her own waving…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ahern v. . GoodspeedNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Wait v. . BorneNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- First National Bank v. FarsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
3Cited by8 opinions
- Aramony v. United Way Replacement Benefit PlanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Ebasco Services Inc. v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Silverstein v. R. H. Macy & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
- Rubin v. Dairymen's League Cooperative Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- American Movie Classics v. Rainbow Media HoldingsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.