Legal Opinion

Burke v. Bonat

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 6, 1931PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cardozo, Ch. J.

The action is for personal injuries.

Plaintiff in 1928 was the proprietor of a “ beauty parlor ” in the city of Troy. Defendants were manufacturers of the appliances that are used in a business of that kind. In particular they manufactured machines with fittings and appurtenances designed to give to hair a permanent wave or curl according to the Bonat method. They employed a traveling salesman, Cooper, who had samples of their products.

Cooper called at the plaintiff’s shop on May 9, 1928, and sold her certain,tubes and winders which if used in connection with her own waving…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ahern v. . GoodspeedNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Wait v. . BorneNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. First National Bank v. FarsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1919

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Aramony v. United Way Replacement Benefit PlanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  2. Ebasco Services Inc. v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Silverstein v. R. H. Macy & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  4. Rubin v. Dairymen's League Cooperative Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  5. American Movie Classics v. Rainbow Media HoldingsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API