Legal Opinion

Moseley Hospital v. Hall

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 6, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Clarke

Affirming.

Henderson is a city of the third class, and has adopted the commission form of government in accordance with the provisions of chapter 92 of the Acts of 1914, now sections 3480b-l to 3480b-29, inclusive, of Kentucky Statutes.

Appellee Hall is the mayor of the city, and, by section 3242 of the statutes, it is made his duty as such to sign all contracts on its behalf. The city commissioners adopted a resolution directing him to execute a contract *646with, the appellant Moseley Hospital for the care and treatment of the city’s poor, for a period of two…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Staebler & Gregg v. Town of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  2. Robertson v. Southern Bitulithic Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  3. Montenegro-Riehm Music Co. v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eagle v. City of CorbinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  2. Barron G. Collier, Inc. v. PaddockArizona Supreme Court · 1930
  3. City of Hartford v. KingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952
  4. Board of Councilmen City of Frankfort v. NoelCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  5. City of Danville v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API