Legal Opinion

Bragg v. Oxford Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 9, 2009No. S08G1031PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Melton, Justice.

Following a serious car accident, Ken and Francesca Bragg, individually and co-administrators of the estate of their stillborn daughter, sued Oxford Construction Company for negligent con*99struction of the road where the accident took place. The trial court granted summary judgment to Oxford based on Georgia’s “acceptance doctrine,”1 and the Court of Appeals affirmed. Bragg v. Oxford Constr. Co., 289 Ga. App. 638 (658 SE2d 198) (2008). We granted certiorari in this case to determine whether the acceptance doctrine should remain viable in Georgia. As explained more fully below,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Robeson v. International Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  2. Flagler Co. v. SavageSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
  3. David Allen Co. v. BentonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
  4. Brawner v. SterdevantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1850

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Angela Marie Stopanio v. Leon's Fence and Guardrail, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  2. Thomaston Acquisition, LLC v. Piedmont Constr. Grp., Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  3. Collard v. Vista Paving Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Hollis & Spann, Inc. v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  5. The Georgia Department of Transportation v. David Delor, as Parent of Alexander DelorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API