Commonwealth v. Desantis
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTS, Judge:
Appellants DeSantis and Conner were jointly tried by a jury and convicted of receiving stolen property. Their individual Motions for a New Trial and/or In Arrest of Judgment were denied and sentences were imposed. Although separate appeals were taken, we dispose of them in a single opinion, granting relief on a common ground. Appellants raise several issues, but on the record before us we need reach only the claim that the suppression court did not meet the requirements of Pa.R.Crim.P. 323(i).* A review of the record satisfies us that the suppression court did not comply with…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TwiggsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. GuintherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LandisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. PittsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. GelberSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. HoakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Commonwealth v. PittsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999