Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Desantis

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 31, 1984No. Nos. 00201 and 00329PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTS, Judge:

Appellants DeSantis and Conner were jointly tried by a jury and convicted of receiving stolen property. Their individual Motions for a New Trial and/or In Arrest of Judgment were denied and sentences were imposed. Although separate appeals were taken, we dispose of them in a single opinion, granting relief on a common ground. Appellants raise several issues, but on the record before us we need reach only the claim that the suppression court did not meet the requirements of Pa.R.Crim.P. 323(i).* A review of the record satisfies us that the suppression court did not comply with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TwiggsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. GuintherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LandisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. PittsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. GelberSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Commonwealth v. HoakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Commonwealth v. PittsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API