Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Hoak

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 12, 1997No. 02348Published

1DissentJohnson, Judge

The Majority concludes that the trial court correctly refused to suppress the evidence obtained during the search of Hoak’s luggage, and bases its decision solely upon the United States Constitution. I believe that we cannot reach the merits of this case because the record as certified to this Court contains no record of the evidence presented to the suppression court. Additionally, even if I assume that the record is sufficient for us to reach the merits, I believe that Hoak’s consent was not effective under the Pennsylvania Constitution. I therefore dissent.

I. EFFECT OF DEFICIENCY IN THE…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API