Legal Opinion
Siedlecki v. Powell
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided June 20, 1978No. 7710SC386PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROCK, Chief Judge.
Defendants bring forward 28 assignments of error on appeal, six of which are argued in their brief in four arguments. The rest are deemed abandoned. App. R. 28(a).
We first discuss defendants’ second argument based upon assignments of error numbers 26 and 27, by which defendants contend that the trial court erred in awarding damages to plaintiff based upon the value of a share of stock of “new” Products International as of 30 November 1973. Defendants contend that damages, if any, should be measured as of 17 March 1971, which is the date plaintiff tendered demand for 15% of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Blackwell v. ButtsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Topzant v. KosheWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
- L. E. Frey, and Cross-Appellant v. Gerald Frankel and Duo-Bed Corporation, a Corporation, and Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
- Price v. RossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
3Cited by4 opinions
- Shields v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- S. J. Groves & Sons & Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Craven v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Carlsten v. the Widecom Group, Inc., 97-1425 (2003)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2003