Forte v. Matthews
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NEWCOMER, District Judge.
This is a review of an administrative determination madé by the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) that plaintiff Forte was not entitled to disability benefits under the Social Security Act. For reasons set forth below, the government’s motion for summary judgment is granted and plaintiff’s cross-motion is denied.
FACTS
Plaintiff, who was 34 years old at the time of the administrative proceeding, has attended business school and received a certificate from two years at vocational technical high school, specializing in computer programming and data…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Charles M. Laws v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
- Pauline Ginsburg v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- James Hess, Jr. v. Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Leo J. Domozik v. Wilbur J. Cohen, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- William Gentile v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Samuel J. Lansberry, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Capoferri v. HarrisDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Padillo v. CalifanoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- Raines v. HarrisDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1980
- Coty v. HarrisDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.