Legal Opinion

United States v. One Studebaker Sedan

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 6, 1944No. 26PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KALODNER, District Judge.

United States of America filed a libel seeking forfeiture of defendant Studebaker Sedan alleging that the vehicle, owned by one Michael, had been used by him “as a pilot or a convoy car for a Plymouth Sedan which was being driven by Earl W. Goat, and was being used for the removal, concealment or deposit of untaxpaid distilled spirits and therefore, in that connection said Studebaker Sedan was being used to bring about the removal, deposit or concealment of goods or commodities, to wit, a quantity of untaxpaid distilled spirits, for or in respect whereof a tax is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. One Dodge SedanDistrict Court, D. California · 1928
  2. United States v. One Plymouth SedanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Hancock v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1928
  4. United States v. One 1938 Buick SedanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1939
  5. United States v. One 1939 Model Ford Pickup Truck, Motor No. 4662201District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1940

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. One 1952 Lincoln Sedan, Motor No. 52lp22535h (Merchants Nat. Bank of Mobile, Intervenor)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  2. United States v. One 1948 Plymouth Sedan, EtcCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  3. United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  4. United States v. One Chevrolet Stylemaster SedanDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1950
  5. United States v. One 1950 Model Willys JeepDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API