Legal Opinion

AT&T Communications-East Inc. v. BNSF Railway Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 22, 2009No. 07-35324Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Appellants AT&T Communications-East and AT&T Corporation (collectively “AT&T”) appeal the district court’s judgments in favor of Appellees BNSF Railway Company (“BNSF”), Portland and Western Railroad, Inc. (“P&W”), and Tri-Coun*489ty Metropolitan Transit District (“TriMet”). They also appeal the district court’s holding that AT&T does not qualify as a “displaced person” under the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Policies Act of 1970 (“URA”). They also appeal the district court’s dismissal of AT&T’s claim against the Oregon Department of Transportation (“ODOT”) with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Norfolk Redevelopment & Housing Authority v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Huff v. DuncanOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Johnson v. State ex rel. Highway DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  4. Schmoele v. Atlantic City R.R. Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
  5. Northwest Natural Gas Co. v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API